ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. to your account, Hi ! Also ZFS is really good. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. You signed in with another tab or window. Click Bootable > Load Boot File. That's an improvement, I guess? I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Some known process are as follows: I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . Supported / Unsupported ISOs Issue #7 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. Its ok. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. I don't know why. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. However the solution is not perfect enough. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. using the direct ISO download method on MS website. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. ISO file name (full exact name) Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. I will test it in a realmachine later. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. Hiren's BootCD The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. I've already disabled secure boot. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. They boot from Ventoy just fine. Still having issues? Please test and tell your opinion. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Maybe because of partition type Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. For these who select to bypass secure boot. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Tried it yesterday. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. 1. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. . Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. . Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. Have a question about this project? Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Best Regards. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. they reviewed all the source code). I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Customizing installed software before installing LM. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. Both are good. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. What matters is what users perceive and expect. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q No. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. This is definitely what you want. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). ? I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. No bootfile found for UEFI! Do I need a custom shim protocol? So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. SecureBoot - Debian Wiki Any kind of solution? Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English Already on GitHub? Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. I think it's OK. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. @steve6375 https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Windows 10 32bit backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Thank you Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Solved: Cannot boot from UEFI USB - HP Support Community - 6634212 Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. memz.mp4. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. I'll fix it. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Ventoy Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. UEFi64? Assert efi error status invalid parameter Smartadm.ru Any ideas? EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot.